Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sofia Sanchez's avatar

Glad to read I was not crazy to find great ideas in old biotech papers! Let's get those Edisons and Fords of our century 😼 💡

https://www.sofias.bio/p/please-build-robots-to-automate-plant

Expand full comment
Michael Magoon's avatar

Interesting article.

I think a big part of the problem is the assumption that basic science research is a fundamental cause of material progress. In fact, I think the causality mainly goes the other way. Science would be nothing without the technological innovations of the telescope, microscope, computer, internet, etc. Plus economic growth enables more individuals to focus on scientific research as opposed to worrying about basic survival.

Technological innovation largely comes from combining existing technologies in new ways. Some scientific knowledge is helpful, but it is not essential to the process. The reason why new technological innovation is getting harder is because it requires a larger number and more complex assemblies of sub-components. It is like a jigsaw puzzle that keeps getting bigger. The bigger the jigsaw puzzle, the harder to solve it.

For those who are interesting, I have a few articles on the subject:

https://frompovertytoprogress.substack.com/p/understanding-technological-innovation

https://frompovertytoprogress.substack.com/p/technological-innovation-is-like

https://frompovertytoprogress.substack.com/p/technology-is-useless-without-the

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts