Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Smith's avatar

Packy, well said. I think one important takeaway--one I'm trying to convey in my own work--is that there's always a trade-off, and the best thing we can do as writers is to get folks thinking about what these trade-offs are. There's no free lunch, and everything we get to have has a cost. If you can't figure out what that cost is easily, there's probably a good reason for that.

Expand full comment
Jason Goodwin's avatar

There is certainly a dichotomy, and probably not in the direction we want to see. With Twitter and YouTube for sure most everything needs to tie into health, wealth and relationships, and ideally involve fear and or sex, precisely because there is a quantifiable market. And it doesn't even have to be quantified on the "platform." Mid-level twitter as you point out works without creator royalties almost as well.

On balance though I "think" this is good so long as we can adjust. There are indeed super interesting and valuable creators making a living teaching physics and other topics on youtube.

I also agree with your point about avoiding the temptation. Many times, the real alpha, and real problems to derive solutions for, lie outside of existing quantified markets. Think environmental externalities and human/animal suffering.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts